HUBG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. has a net margin of 3.1% compared to Hub Group, Inc.'s net margin of 7.71%. Hub Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.21% beat Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.'s return on equity of 37.32%.

Hub Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $45.73, signalling upside risk potential of 8.99%. On the other hand Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $140.47 which suggests that it could fall by -14.89%. Given that Hub Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., analysts believe Hub Group, Inc. is more attractive than Expeditors International of Washington, Inc..

Hub Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.378% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. has a beta of 1.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.412%.

Hub Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Hub Group, Inc. pays 29.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. pays out 25.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hub Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $934.5M, which are smaller than Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Hub Group, Inc.'s net income of $28.9M is lower than Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.'s net income of $223.1M. Notably, Hub Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.15x while Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hub Group, Inc. is 0.68x versus 2.03x for Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forward Air Corp. has a net margin of 3.1% compared to Hub Group, Inc.'s net margin of -3.76%. Hub Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.21% beat Forward Air Corp.'s return on equity of -55.76%.

Hub Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $45.73, signalling upside risk potential of 8.99%. On the other hand Forward Air Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $35.67 which suggests that it could grow by 19.33%. Given that Forward Air Corp. has higher upside potential than Hub Group, Inc., analysts believe Forward Air Corp. is more attractive than Hub Group, Inc..

Hub Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.378% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Air Corp. has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.714%.

Hub Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Forward Air Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Hub Group, Inc. pays 29.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hub Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $934.5M, which are larger than Forward Air Corp. quarterly revenues of $631.8M. Hub Group, Inc.'s net income of $28.9M is higher than Forward Air Corp.'s net income of -$23.8M. Notably, Hub Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.15x while Forward Air Corp.'s PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hub Group, Inc. is 0.68x versus 0.36x for Forward Air Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 3.1% compared to Hub Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. Hub Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.21% beat Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Hub Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $45.73, signalling upside risk potential of 8.99%. On the other hand Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 230.69%. Given that Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hub Group, Inc., analysts believe Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Hub Group, Inc..

Hub Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.378% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has a beta of 4.271, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 327.091%.

Hub Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hub Group, Inc. pays 29.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hub Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $934.5M, which are larger than Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Hub Group, Inc.'s net income of $28.9M is higher than Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Hub Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.15x while Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hub Group, Inc. is 0.68x versus 0.05x for Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RXO, Inc. has a net margin of 3.1% compared to Hub Group, Inc.'s net margin of -0.99%. Hub Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.21% beat RXO, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.61%.

Hub Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $45.73, signalling upside risk potential of 8.99%. On the other hand RXO, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.44 which suggests that it could fall by -6.85%. Given that Hub Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than RXO, Inc., analysts believe Hub Group, Inc. is more attractive than RXO, Inc..

Hub Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.378% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RXO, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hub Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. RXO, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hub Group, Inc. pays 29.38% of its earnings as a dividend. RXO, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hub Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $934.5M, which are smaller than RXO, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Hub Group, Inc.'s net income of $28.9M is higher than RXO, Inc.'s net income of -$14M. Notably, Hub Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.15x while RXO, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hub Group, Inc. is 0.68x versus 0.47x for RXO, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.